|
|
This site requires the Adobe Flash Player plugin to work properly. Sorry for any inconvenience.
This site requires the Adobe Flash Player plugin to work properly. Sorry for any inconvenience.
The Commission adopted i.a. the following documents:
Draft standards and related texts at Step 8 (adoption of the standard)
![]() |
Proposed draft standards and related texts at Step 5 (adoption of the draft standard)
Revocation of existing Codex standards and related texts
![]() |
Proposals for the elaboration of new standards and related texts
Matters arising from the reports of the Codex Committees and Task Forces
The Commission noted several matters arising from the reports of Codex Committees, including matters arising from the latest session of the CCFFV (Mexico, October 2009), during which it was noted that the UNECE Working Party on Agricultural Standards had decided to remove the reference to “UNECE” from the cover pages of its standards and label them as “UN” standards instead, and request the Codex Secretariat to explore the implications of this decision. The change from “UNECE” to “UN” standards was intended to avoid giving the impression that the standards are meant to be used within the UNECE region (i.e. Europe) only.
The INC intervened to stress its support for the “globalization” of UNECE standards to UN standards. In the view of the INC, the consumption, production and trade of nuts and dried fruits has now truly become global, therefore worldwide standards are needed to aid international trade. This globalization is reflected in the wide range of activities that Codex had already undertaken on the safety of nuts and dried fruits through the development of sampling plans and provisions for contaminants, additives, and pesticides. The INC acknowledged the work of the UNECE Specialized Section on Dry and Dried Produce in the development of commodity standards for this type of products, supporting the “globalization” of UNECE standards by changing the title to "UN" standards.
Consideration of the impact of private standards
The FAO representative presented a paper regarding private food safety standards (impact on market access and public health, certification costs, transparency and stakeholder participation, and legitimacy), especially with regard to developing countries. A number of concerns were highlighted, including the tendency for private companies to set more stringent standards than those of Codex, the limited opportunities for developing country input, the difficulties to implement private standards in small-scale food businesses in developing countries, the cost of certification and multiple certification requirements. A key question is whether private standards support or undermine public policy.
Use of this website signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use. Privacy Statement · Web design
© INC International Nut and Dried Fruit Council